Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 4
A blog series by WhiteHat Security
September 12, 2018

Eric Sheridan
WhiteHat Security

The previous chapter in this WhiteHat Security series examined the security component of step three of the Twelve-Factor methodology — storing config in the environment — with a key focus on the importance of auditing the environment when externalizing. This means identifying and applying hardening guidelines to the environment, and taking the opportunity to leverage a third party security team to assess the environment.

Start with Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 1

Start with Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 2

Start with Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 3

This next blog examines the security component of step four of the Twelve-Factor methodology — backing services. Here follows some actionable advice from the WhiteHat Security Addendum Checklist, which developers and ops engineers can follow during the SaaS build and operations stages.

Defining Backing Services in the Twelve-Factor App

The fourth factor of the Twelve-Factor methodology advises treating backing services as attached resources. It describes backing services as anything that’s outside of your app that may be treated as a resource, for example datastores, messaging/queuing systems, SMTP services for outbound email and caching services.

According to Twelve-Factor, backing services like the database are traditionally managed by the same systems administrators as the app’s runtime deploy. Additionally, the app may also have services provided and managed by third parties. What’s key here is that the code for a twelve-factor app makes no distinction between local and third party services. From the app’s point of view, both are attached resources, which means that a deploy of the twelve-factor app should be able to interchange a local MySQL database with one managed by a third party without any changes to the app’s code.

The rationale is that resources can be attached to and detached from deploys at will. Twelve-Factor shares this example: “If the app’s database is misbehaving due to a hardware issue, the app’s administrator might spin up a new database server restored from a recent backup. The current production database could be detached, and the new database attached — all without any code changes.”

Applying Security to Backing Services

Treating backing services as attached resources helps to encourage encapsulated development and smaller programs for example, but from a security perspective, backing services can also inadvertently encapsulate vulnerabilities.

It’s important to keep the following in mind:

1. You assume their risk

Understand the security posture of the backing service and write code as if it is being attacked, or is attacking you. This is important because at some point in the application’s normal business operation, it will either send or receive sensitive data from the backing service.

If the backing service contains a vulnerability that is exploited, this means that the application’s sensitive data (including customer data) is subject to exposure. Even though you may not have written or built that backing service, ultimately the responsibility is still yours should it be exploited.

2. Secure your communications

Establish all connections using Transport Layer Security (TLS), a cryptographic protocol that provides communications security over a computer network. Authenticate to the backing service using a least privileged account i.e. an account that has only the minimum set of permissions or privileges necessary for it to complete its task.

For example, consider iOS or Android-based mobile devices. When logging into these devices, using a pin number, we are usually logging in with a personal account, which has limited capabilities and permissions. More specifically, it’s not possible to obtain system level privileges on iOS or Android devices. unless we jailbreak those devices. Apple and Google designed these products so that the users (as well as the applications) have enough capabilities to carry out basic tasks but restrict the ability of the user to perform system level tasks.

This analogy is similar to backing services. When we connect and authenticate to a backing service, we are using an account that has just enough permission to carry out the functionality that the application needs. As an example, assume the application needs to connect to a Postgres database. The solution involves creating a separate Postgres account for the application with only the necessary privileges.

3. Resource security abstraction

Encapsulate security checks within the Resource abstraction, and limit the need for users of the Resource abstraction to be security aware.

Read Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 5

Eric Sheridan is Chief Scientist at WhiteHat Security
Share this

Industry News

December 19, 2024

Check Point® Software Technologies Ltd. has been recognized as a Leader in the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Email Security Platforms (ESP).

December 19, 2024

Progress announced its partnership with the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA), the world’s largest member association representing the CPA profession.

December 18, 2024

Kurrent announced $12 million in funding, its rebrand from Event Store and the official launch of Kurrent Enterprise Edition, now commercially available.

December 18, 2024

Blitzy announced the launch of the Blitzy Platform, a category-defining agentic platform that accelerates software development for enterprises by autonomously batch building up to 80% of software applications.

December 17, 2024

Sonata Software launched IntellQA, a Harmoni.AI powered testing automation and acceleration platform designed to transform software delivery for global enterprises.

December 17, 2024

Sonar signed a definitive agreement to acquire Tidelift, a provider of software supply chain security solutions that help organizations manage the risk of open source software.

December 17, 2024

Kindo formally launched its channel partner program.

December 16, 2024

Red Hat announced the latest release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI), Red Hat’s foundation model platform for more seamlessly developing, testing and running generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) models for enterprise applications.

December 16, 2024

Fastly announced the general availability of Fastly AI Accelerator.

December 12, 2024

Amazon Web Services (AWS) announced the launch and general availability of Amazon Q Developer plugins for Datadog and Wiz in the AWS Management Console.

December 12, 2024

vFunction released new capabilities that solve a major microservices headache for development teams – keeping documentation current as systems evolve – and make it simpler to manage and remediate tech debt.

December 11, 2024

CyberArk announced the launch of FuzzyAI, an open-source framework that helps organizations identify and address AI model vulnerabilities, like guardrail bypassing and harmful output generation, in cloud-hosted and in-house AI models.

December 11, 2024

Grid Dynamics announced the launch of its developer portal.

December 10, 2024

LTIMindtree announced a strategic partnership with GitHub.