Exploratory Testing Cuts Risk of Software Failures
July 31, 2017

Wayne Ariola
Tricentis

Agile development compresses software testing cycles, jeopardizing risk coverage and opening the door for software failures. Here's what you can do:

The adoption of Agile and iterative development processes is forcing testing teams to conduct and complete testing more rapidly than in the past. Teams that previously had weeks or months to test must now accelerate testing to deliver even more comprehensive test results in a matter of hours or days. Today, testing must be performed under intense time pressure — often with reduced resources and budget. And that spells R-I-S-K. After all, how comprehensive can your testing be under such duress, and what is the risk of failure once the software goes into production?

A recent survey of over 2,400 respondents revealed that many enterprise testing teams are adopting exploratory testing in response to these challenges and risks.

Among these respondents, exploratory testing is increasingly being used to evaluate how an application performs from the perspective of the end user. Exploratory testing is often contrasted with formal testing, which focuses solely on verification (i.e., whether the acceptance criteria outlined in requirements specifications have been met). That's called validation. As such, formal testing monitors known risks, whereas exploratory testing focuses primarily on analyzing potential risks.

Verification and validation are independent procedures used together to check and confirm that a product meets the requirements and specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose.

Because exploratory testing does not require laborious upfront planning, teams commonly apply it to start testing new software functionality as soon as it's completed. This promotes rapid defect detection within the compressed development cycles that are the norm today. And, because exploratory testing encourages branching and exploration of different testing ideas in a way that simulates the end user's perspective, it tends to uncover, and therefore snuff out, more critical defects than formal testing.

But why has exploratory testing become so widely adopted? And how are testing teams using it? Take a look at selected findings from the survey for more insight.

1. Agile Has Become the Primary Driver for Exploratory Testing Adoption

87 percent of respondents use exploratory testing to accelerate agile development cycles by providing feedback as quickly as possible to all parties concerned (e.g., development, business, and operations). Agile processes require teams to react quickly to changes and adapt accordingly. This is valuable since rapid feedback enables teams to “fail early,” when the failure can be remedied before a system goes into production.

2. Exploratory Testing Supplements Test Automation

91 percent of the respondents who are actively adopting or practicing DevOps consider exploratory testing a critical practice for risk reduction. More than 9 out of 10 respondents state that it is crucial to combine test automation and exploratory testing in a fast-paced development environment. To prevent process bottlenecks, teams use risk coverage criteria to select the most powerful set of automated tests to run at the various stages of the software delivery pipeline.

3. Exploratory Testing Accelerates Defect Detection

Respondents who practice exploratory testing estimate that, by exposing defects earlier (when defects are easier to eliminate), they accelerate delivery by approximately 20 percent. Exploratory testing exposes many defects that would otherwise be overlooked until real users encountered them in production.

4. Exploratory Testing Uncovers Types of Defects Overlooked by Formal Testing Techniques

Respondents practicing exploratory testing report that the top three issues exposed by exploratory testing are (95 percent) usability issues such as confusing interfaces or inconsistent usage patterns (95 percent); missing requirements (for example, functionality that is critical for the end user experience, but was not originally specified (87 percent); and problems with functionality that was implemented beyond the boundaries of specification, and thus not covered by specification-based tests (85 percent).

5. Exploratory Testing is Popular for Testing Usability

The most frequently software characteristic tested by exploratory testing is usability (93 percent), followed by performance (77 percent), security (62 percent), stability (54 percent), and safety (40 percent).

6. Exploratory testing is Geared for User Acceptance Testing, Regression Testing, and Smoke Testing

95 percent of respondents actively practicing exploratory testing state that exploratory testing is applied during user-acceptance testing, followed by 72 percent during regression testing, and 37 percent during smoke testing (testing that comprises a non-exhaustive set of tests to determine if a build is stable enough to proceed with further testing).

In any approach to software testing, the objective is to eliminate risk of software failure. With exploratory testing, software testers now have a potent addition to their testing regimens.

Wayne Ariola is CMO at Tricentis
Share this

Industry News

March 06, 2025

Parasoft(link is external) is showcasing its latest product innovations at embedded world Exhibition, booth 4-318(link is external), including new GenAI integration with Microsoft Visual Studio Code (VS Code) to optimize test automation of safety-critical applications while reducing development time, cost, and risk.

March 06, 2025

JFrog announced general availability of its integration with NVIDIA NIM microservices, part of the NVIDIA AI Enterprise software platform.

March 06, 2025

CloudCasa by Catalogic announce an integration with SUSE® Rancher Prime via a new Rancher Prime Extension.

March 05, 2025

MacStadium(link is external) announced the extended availability of Orka(link is external) Cluster 3.2, establishing the market’s first enterprise-grade macOS virtualization solution available across multiple deployment options.

March 05, 2025

JFrog is partnering with Hugging Face, host of a repository of public machine learning (ML) models — the Hugging Face Hub — designed to achieve more robust security scans and analysis forevery ML model in their library.

March 05, 2025

Copado launched DevOps Automation Agent on Salesforce's AgentExchange, a global ecosystem marketplace powered by AppExchange for leading partners building new third-party agents and agent actions for Agentforce.

March 05, 2025

Harness completed its merger with Traceable, effective March 4, 2025.

March 04, 2025

JFrog released JFrog ML, an MLOps solution as part of the JFrog Platform designed to enable development teams, data scientists and ML engineers to quickly develop and deploy enterprise-ready AI applications at scale.

March 04, 2025

Progress announced the addition of Web Application Firewall (WAF) functionality to Progress® MOVEit® Cloud managed file transfer (MFT) solution.

March 04, 2025

Couchbase launched Couchbase Edge Server, an offline-first, lightweight database server and sync solution designed to provide low latency data access, consolidation, storage and processing for applications in resource-constrained edge environments.

March 04, 2025

Sonatype announced end-to-end AI Software Composition Analysis (AI SCA) capabilities that enable enterprises to harness the full potential of AI.

March 03, 2025

Aviatrix® announced the launch of the Aviatrix Kubernetes Firewall.

March 03, 2025

ScaleOps announced the general availability of their Pod Placement feature, a solution that helps companies manage Kubernetes infrastructure.

March 03, 2025

Cloudsmith raised a $23 million Series B funding round led by TCV, with participation from Insight Partners and existing investors.

February 27, 2025

IBM has completed its acquisition of HashiCorp, whose products automate and secure the infrastructure that underpins hybrid cloud applications and generative AI.