Revealing the Cultural Divide Between Application Security and Development
October 27, 2020

Christian van den Branden
ZeroNorth

Everyone knows quality software drives higher productivity and provides a significant economic benefit to the enterprise. It is the main differentiator in the success and overall competitive edge of companies today, which is precisely why software must be secure. It sounds simple enough, but there's a problem: not everyone is on the same page on how to ensure that security is baked into applications from the onset, more specifically during the build. More, not everyone is sure of their own individual role in the larger security effort. And not everyone agrees on who is in charge.


For the good of software, it is time to bring this quandary into sharper focus. Organizations are scooping up application scanning tools to implement their application security program, but they often fall short of their expectations of such a program. Because each tool produces large and different data sets, development teams are often buried under mountains of findings without a clear path towards action. This ineffective process is problematic in many ways, first being that it is not organizationally scalable. Product teams have to meet objectives set by the security team, using the tools they are unfamiliar with, even if they are short-handed and ill equipped to consistently execute and deal with these outputs.

Further, AppSec ownership is fragmented, as security and product leaders are failing to collaborate on secure software delivery. Because each side is measured by different standards and goals, their incentives differ as well. And in many instance, they aren't communicating at all. This is where the work to improve application security is still waiting to be done.

The Truth Emerges

Fortunately, there is now some hard data to illuminate this issue. A recent research report conducted by the Ponemon Institute explores the misalignment between AppSec and DevOps.

According to the findings, 75% of AppSec practitioners and 49% of developers believe there is, in fact, a cultural divide between their respective teams. And this schism is getting in the way of productivity and security. Each team has different priorities and views. Developers are all about speed and innovation, while security folks are focused on making sure applications are bulletproof before hitting the market.

Both sides of the aisle admit there is a problem. In fact, 56% of developers insist AppSec teams do not understand the pressure they face to build and deploy software as fast as possible. And security folks say DevOps teams do not worry enough about the security of applications early in the development life cycle, which means code is often pushed out with known vulnerabilities. Further, the two sides disagree on whether or not application risk is even increasing, with 60% of AppSec professionals saying it most definitely is. But only 35% of developers agree with this assertion.

Worst of all, Ponemon's recent report highlights the fact that no one really agrees on who "owns" the larger bucket of application security. Thirty nine percent of developers say the security team is responsible, while 67% of AppSec practitioners say their own teams are.

Time to Work Together

Regardless of who is right, the work of securing software lies in the balance. If the Ponemon study tells us one thing, it's that we all need to start thinking more seriously about how to break down siloes, reshape mindsets and unify AppSec and DevOps. As software production continues to accelerate, the need for more secure release processes becomes increasingly critical. Organizations must find effective ways to bring security into the world of development through collaboration and a serious shift in perception — and this effort starts with people.

Before companies can even think about technology, they need to align their teams. Leaders and CISOs alike must complete the groundwork with both sides to establish a shared vision of more secure software. Once objectives and incentives are in place, organizations can think about moving forward to implement a more robust DevSecOps model. In this new world order, there are three things to remember about software:

1. Software development needs structure. Enterprise standards have to be upheld so business, security and development leaders can innovate with confidence.

2. Software development thrives on speed. To accelerate pipeline velocity and software delivery, organizations need to orchestrate the continuous discovery and remediation of vulnerabilities throughout the development life cycle.

3. Software development takes focus. Developers need to be unburdened so they can move past the friction and into the realm of successful innovation, meeting corporate standards along the way.

This shift in thinking isn't just good for teams — it translates into better workflows and business practices. Seventy seven percent of develops say this existing gap affects their ability to meet deadlines, which translates into lost opportunities and revenue. Securing applications is a now a business imperative, and for regulated industries with heavy compliance requirements, governance is critical and needs to be centralized. This is what allows different teams to work in conjunction with one another for the good of software.

Christian van den Branden is SVP Engineering at ZeroNorth
Share this

Industry News

May 13, 2024

ServiceNow introduced a new no‑code development studio and new automation capabilities to accelerate and scale digital transformation across the enterprise.

May 13, 2024

Security Innovation has added new skills assessments to its Base Camp training platform for software security training.

May 13, 2024

CAST introduced CAST Highlight Extensions Marketplace — an integrated marketplace for the software intelligence product where users can effortlessly browse and download a diverse range of extensions and plugins.

May 09, 2024

Red Hat and Elastic announced an expanded collaboration to deliver next-generation search experiences supporting retrieval augmented generation (RAG) patterns using Elasticsearch as a preferred vector database solution integrated on Red Hat OpenShift AI.

May 09, 2024

Traceable AI announced an Early Access Program for its new Generative AI API Security capabilities.

May 09, 2024

StackHawk announced a new integration with Microsoft Defender for Cloud to help organizations build software more securely.

May 08, 2024

MacStadium announced that it has obtained Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Security, Trust & Assurance Registry (STAR) Level 1, meaning that MacStadium has publicly documented its compliance with CSA’s Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM), and that it joined the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), the world’s leading organization dedicated to defining and raising awareness of best practices to help ensure a secure cloud computing environment.

May 08, 2024

The Cloud Native Computing Foundation® (CNCF®) released the two-day schedule for CloudNativeSecurityCon North America 2024 happening in Seattle, Washington from June 26-27, 2024.

May 08, 2024

Sumo Logic announced new AI and security analytics capabilities that allow security and development teams to align around a single source of truth and collect and act on data insights more quickly.

May 08, 2024

Red Hat is announcing an optional additional 12-month EUS term for OpenShift 4.14 and subsequent even-numbered Red Hat OpenShift releases in the 4.x series.

May 08, 2024

HAProxy Technologies announced the launch of HAProxy Enterprise 2.9.

May 08, 2024

ArmorCode announced the general availability of AI Correlation in the ArmorCode ASPM Platform.

May 08, 2024

Octopus Deploy launched new features to help simplify Kubernetes CD at scale for enterprises.

May 08, 2024

Cequence announced multiple ML-powered advancements to its Unified API Protection (UAP) platform.

May 07, 2024

Oracle announced plans for Oracle Code Assist, an AI code companion, to help developers boost velocity and enhance code consistency.