App Developers Waste Time Debugging Errors Discovered in Production
November 28, 2016

Mohit Bhatnagar
ClusterHQ

Almost half (43 percent) of app developers spend between 10 and 25 percent of their time debugging application errors discovered in production, rather than developing new features, according to ClusterHQ's first Application Testing survey.

The top three challenges reported by survey respondents were:

■ An inability to fully recreate production environments in testing (33%)

■ Interdependence on external systems that makes integration testing difficult (27%)

■ Testing against unrealistic data before moving into production (26%)

With more organizations transitioning to microservices-based applications, it is apparent that legacy testing processes are no longer sufficient to meet the speed and agility requirements of modern businesses.

“Our Application Testing survey highlights that legacy software development practices, like relying on narrow subsets of synthetic data for testing, no longer cut it for teams focused on maximizing the amount of time they spend building features that users value,” said Mark Davis, CEO, ClusterHQ. “Forward looking software developer leaders understand that to deliver innovation to customers they must effectively manage the entire application lifecycle across a diverse range of infrastructures, a process that begins with identifying and eliminating bugs as early as possible so that teams can focus on adding end-user value.”

Errors found in production are costly

Respondents were asked to identity the environment in which they encounter bugs that are most costly to fix. Unsurprisingly, the majority (62%) selected production as the most expensive stage of app development to fix errors, followed by development (18%), staging (7%), QA (7%) and testing (6%).

Next, the survey took a deeper look at how often bugs are being encountered in production as a result of incomplete testing. Findings revealed:

■ Every day: 11%
■ Two to three times per week: 13%
■ Once per week: 12%
■ Every other week: 15%
■ Once a month: 25%
■ Don’t know: 21%
■ Never: 3%

A quarter of respondents report encountering bugs discovered in production one or more times per week. Developing new features should be priority number one in agile software development, however when asked what percentage of development time is spent debugging application errors discovered in production instead of working on new features, results showed:

■ Less than 10%: 34%
■ Between 10-25%: 43%
■ Between 25-50%: 18%
■ Between 50-75%: 4%
■ More than 75%: 1%

Causes of bugs in production

Testing is a crucial part of an application’s lifecycle, but it’s inherently challenging to ensure that tests done in development will mirror what happens in production. Survey takers were asked to select the top challenge associated with testing that causes bugs to appear in production. They responded:

■ Inability to fully recreate production environments in testing: 33%
■ Interdependence on external systems, making integration testing difficult: 27%
■ Testing against unrealistic data before moving into production: 26%
■ Difficulty sharing test data across different teams: 10%
■ Difficulty creating staging environments for testing: 4%

Recreating production environments was cited as the leading cause of bugs appearing in production, supporting the notion that testing on a laptop is like “flying” in a flight simulator – the experience can be very different when you actually get up in the air. This challenge was followed closely by interdependence on external systems that makes integration testing cumbersome, which leads into the third most cited challenge: testing against unrealistic data. At present, data is difficult to move between all the places that it is needed, including in test infrastructure. As a result, unrealistic, mock data sets are often used to test applications. However, these unrealistic data sets cannot prepare applications for all real world variables, and thus cause serious, expensive, and time consuming issues down the line.

Testing apps against realistic data

A resounding number of respondents (88%) would like the ability to test with realistic data during application development. However, this is not as easy as it sounds, and there are real challenges that prevent this from being the norm. When asked to identify the biggest challenge to testing against realistic data sets, respondents reported:

■ Keeping test data up-to-date: 23%
■ Moving data to all the places it is needed for testing: 19.5%
■ Keeping track of different versions of data to be used for different purposes: 19.5%
■ Managing access controls to data: 18%
■ Making copies of production data: 14%
■ Storage costs: 6%

The full survey polled 386 respondents. Not all respondents answered every question. Results shown are based on the percent of people who answered each individual question. In this survey, 41 percent identified as DevOps team members, followed by developers (37%), other (8%), operations (7%), QA (5%) and security (2%). Respondents work for organizations that range in size from 1 to 100 employees (49%), 101-500 employees (20%), 501-2500 employees (10%), 2501-5000 employees (5%), 5001-10,000 employees (3%) and 10,000+ employees (13%).

Mohit Bhatnagar is VP Product at ClusterHQ.

Share this

Industry News

March 10, 2025

Parasoft is accelerating the release of its C/C++test 2025.1 solution, following the just-published MISRA C:2025 coding standard.

March 10, 2025

GitHub is making GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) more accessible for developers and teams of all sizes.

March 10, 2025

ArmorCode announced the enhanced ArmorCode Partner Program, highlighting its goal to achieve a 100 percent channel-first sales model.

March 06, 2025

Parasoft is showcasing its latest product innovations at embedded world Exhibition, booth 4-318, including new GenAI integration with Microsoft Visual Studio Code (VS Code) to optimize test automation of safety-critical applications while reducing development time, cost, and risk.

March 06, 2025

JFrog announced general availability of its integration with NVIDIA NIM microservices, part of the NVIDIA AI Enterprise software platform.

March 06, 2025

CloudCasa by Catalogic announce an integration with SUSE® Rancher Prime via a new Rancher Prime Extension.

March 05, 2025

MacStadium announced the extended availability of Orka Cluster 3.2, establishing the market’s first enterprise-grade macOS virtualization solution available across multiple deployment options.

March 05, 2025

JFrog is partnering with Hugging Face, host of a repository of public machine learning (ML) models — the Hugging Face Hub — designed to achieve more robust security scans and analysis forevery ML model in their library.

March 05, 2025

Copado launched DevOps Automation Agent on Salesforce's AgentExchange, a global ecosystem marketplace powered by AppExchange for leading partners building new third-party agents and agent actions for Agentforce.

March 05, 2025

Harness completed its merger with Traceable, effective March 4, 2025.

March 04, 2025

JFrog released JFrog ML, an MLOps solution as part of the JFrog Platform designed to enable development teams, data scientists and ML engineers to quickly develop and deploy enterprise-ready AI applications at scale.

March 04, 2025

Progress announced the addition of Web Application Firewall (WAF) functionality to Progress® MOVEit® Cloud managed file transfer (MFT) solution.

March 04, 2025

Couchbase launched Couchbase Edge Server, an offline-first, lightweight database server and sync solution designed to provide low latency data access, consolidation, storage and processing for applications in resource-constrained edge environments.

March 04, 2025

Sonatype announced end-to-end AI Software Composition Analysis (AI SCA) capabilities that enable enterprises to harness the full potential of AI.

March 03, 2025

Aviatrix® announced the launch of the Aviatrix Kubernetes Firewall.