Managed Automation - The Answer to Agile Development
April 24, 2017

Ayal Zylberman
QualiTest Group

"Nothing is sure in life except for death and taxes," the saying goes. If someone were to update that expression for present day tech consumers, they could add: "and the expectation of regular software updates." It's what developers are tasked with, and what users expect and demand – increased functionality, better performance, and fewer bugs – often in a week or less. Automation of critical processes such as QA can help meet the gargantuan task of constant updates, but it can also send your software into a death spiral of user abandonment unless deployed correctly.

How We've Attempted to Meet the Challenge of Continuous Deployment

One of the most significant developments in attempting to streamline the process of continuous deployment is agile development. Agile development is a general project management approach that emphasizes the dividing of product development work into small manageable portions. These are worked on by a cross-section of teams from those that deal with coding, to those that oversee design and testing.

By breaking tasks into manageable cross-sections, companies are well positioned to put out incremental updates that fix bugs, include new features and keep the user happy. The only issue with this is that adopting the strategy alone isn't feasible for smaller companies, and even for those companies that can afford it, paying developers for the time it takes to release at that pace can be financially draining.

Why Automation of QA Is So Promising

By turning to automation for some of the processes such as QA, companies can theoretically be working to debug and improve quality 24/7. Moreover, it saves the enormous amount of money that the large staff capable of churning out those updates would cost for the SMEs that can't afford it. For those that can, it frees up engineers' time so that they can develop even better features and utilize their time more efficiently.

Nonetheless, although automation can seem like the perfect solution, relying on it exclusively may end not with increased productivity, but rather massive product abandonment and total failure.

How to Utilize Automation Without Failing

Over 60% of automated solutions fail. This rate is startlingly high, but is also largely caused by avoidable issues. Most commonly, automation testers themselves lack the skills to provide proper implementation of automation.

People overseeing the process often use the wrong automation tools or frameworks and fail to adapt regression tests which eventually grow stale, depending on them over and over instead of making sure that they evolve with the product itself.

But it's not just those who directly oversee the automation process that are at fault; it's also more often than not the framework established by the organization that contributes to automation failure.

Automation's Place

Automation is still not a solution for every problem, nor is it possible to make each testing solution 100% automated. The most common mistakes and improvements relating to automation still rely on human QA testers. It's important to make sure that any automation process includes a pairing with experienced testers with industry-specific experience. By focusing on adding skilled employees who fit into the automation process as an add-on rather than trying to make the automation process a cure-all, companies can gain a competitive edge and make better products, faster.

The agile development process is here to stay and those who don't adapt will get trounced until they are made completely obsolete. This shock to the software development process is a challenge because it requires quick adaptation, continuous updates, and a lot of critical work done on a tight timeline.

But, it's also an opportunity that can be leveraged through a delicate balance of automation and experienced QA professionals. Getting the combination right will mean money saved, better products, and happier customers.

Ayal Zylberman is CEO and Founder of QualiTest Group

The Latest

August 15, 2018

Microservices are a hot topic in IT circles these days. The idea of a modular approach to system building – where you have numerous, smaller software services that talk to each other instead of monolithic components – has many benefits ...

August 13, 2018

Agile is expanding within the enterprise. Agile adoption is growing within organizations, both more broadly and deeply, according to the 12th annual State of Agile report from CollabNet VersionOne. A higher percentage of respondents this year report that "all or almost all" of their teams are agile, and that agile principles and practices are being adopted at higher levels in the organization ...

August 09, 2018

For the past 13 years, the Ponemon Institute has examined the cost associated with data breaches of less than 100,000 records, finding that the costs have steadily risen over the course of the study. The average cost of a data breach was $3.86 million in the 2018 study, compared to $3.50 million in 2014 – representing nearly 10 percent net increase over the past 5 years of the study ...

August 08, 2018

Hidden costs in data breaches – such as lost business, negative impact on reputation and employee time spent on recovery – are difficult and expensive to manage, according to the 2018 Cost of a Data Breach Study, sponsored by IBM Security and conducted by Ponemon Institute. The study found that the average cost of a data breach globally is $3.86 million ...

August 06, 2018

The previous chapter in this WhiteHat Security series discussed dependencies as the second step of the Twelve-Factor App. This next chapter examines the security component of step three of the Twelve-Factor methodology — storing configurations within the environment.

August 02, 2018

Results from new Forrester Consulting research reveal the 20 most important Agile and DevOps quality metrics that separate DevOps/Agile experts from their less advanced peers ...

July 31, 2018

Even organizations that understand the importance of cybersecurity in theory often stumble when it comes to marrying security initiatives with their development and operations processes. Most businesses agree that everyone should be responsible for security, but this principle is not being upheld on a day-to-day basis in many organizations. That’s bad news for everyone. Here are some best practices for implementing SecOps ...

July 30, 2018

While the technologies, processes, and cultural shifts of DevOps have improved the ability of software teams to deliver reliable work rapidly and effectively, security has not been a focal point in the transformation of cloud IT infrastructure. SecOps is a methodology that seeks to address this by operationalizing and hardening security throughout the software lifecycle ...

July 26, 2018

Organizations are shifting away from traditional, monolithic architectures, with three-quarters of survey respondents delivering at least some of their applications and more than one-third delivering most of their applications as microservices, according to the State of DevOps Observability Report from Scalyr ...

July 24, 2018

What top considerations must companies make to ensure – or at least help improve – Agile at scale? The following are key techniques and practices to help accelerate Agile delivery rollouts and scale Agile and DevOps in the Enterprise ...

Share this