Clearing the Software Testing Bottleneck
November 01, 2017

Bob Davis
Plutora

Throughout the software development and delivery process, each team plays a pivotal role in ensuring that the end result is exactly what is needed. However, all too often the software testing team, who come in towards the end of the cycle, is labeled as a bottleneck that slows down the process. But it is always important to see both sides of an argument and understand the pressures put on the testing team.

The challenges are varied, but also point towards a more efficient future. In a recent survey by PractiTest and Tea-Time with Testers, 47 percent of test teams said they found coping with development timeframes very challenging.

Additionally, more involvement in the work of the company outside of testing was a big challenge to 41 percent of respondents, and 44 percent said team size was their biggest issue.

These top responses show the pressures facing test teams in a highly productive dev organization. But why are they feeling these pressures and how can it be fixed? These are the big questions that organizations should be asking themselves.

Poor Software Testing Productivity

Release cycles are speeding up as enterprise organizations strive to increase productivity through agile and continuous delivery practices. While accelerating delivery has tremendous benefits, it exposes inefficient processes.

Software testing teams are finding that the manual process that used to be good enough can no longer keep up with the pace of delivery. And although 85 percent of respondents indicated that their company uses automation, only 19 percent use automation for more than 50 percent of test cases.

These figures speak specifically to test automation, but manual processes plague the entire software testing lifecycle. Communication, test management, documentation, and testing practices are all vulnerable to manual inefficiencies.

What's Impacting Software Testing Productivity?

The first step to fixing testing bottlenecks is identifying exactly what is slowing down enterprise software testing productivity. The biggest areas that impact this are often weak test prioritization, poor dependency management and bad communication.

Weak Test Prioritization
How is testing prioritized? How is test prioritization being updated based on feedback from development and testing?

It is human nature to go after the low-hanging fruit, to get a few quick wins to show progress, and testing is no different. Unfortunately, this just pushes off the hard tests to later when there is less time to address any issues that arise.

In any situation, it is beneficial to prioritize testing the highest value and most risky pieces first. Also, not relying on initial estimates of what the highest value and most risky things are is important. Feedback from development can help teams focus on the right things first while feedback from testing can help guide the process as it moves forward. Remember, defects tend to cluster, so as defects start popping up, re-evaluate where the focus needs to be.

Poor Dependency Management
Part of what can make software testing unpredictable is the reliance on so many dependencies lining up at the same time. Of course, this often doesn't happen and when dependencies are mismanaged it can result in unnecessary downtime and a significant slowdown of the whole process.

Some of the things that software tests can be dependent on, include:
■ Requirements
■ Other tests
■ Test data
■ Test environments
■ Development completion
■ Quality of code

Productivity depends on knowing a team's specific dependencies, understanding how those dependencies are progressing, and managing those dependencies.

Mapping out and managing dependencies is fairly straightforward to talk about, but in an enterprise where multiple teams are working on multiple projects, it's often not that easy. There needs to be a process in place to track all teams' dependencies and highlight the ones that may cause an impact.

This is difficult to do with spreadsheets or legacy testing tools, but a modern testing tool that includes testing design, planning, manual and automated execution, defect tracking, and progress reporting into a single interface should provide the traceability to track these dependencies.

Bad Communication
Nobody can be productive if they are not communicating effectively. Email, calls, and meetings are ineffective forms of communication.

In fact, a study by the Harvard Business Review found that only a little more than half of the people were able to correctly ascertain the context and meaning of email.

Additionally, it has been found that humans consistently overestimate the ability of an email receiver's ability to ascertain context, and that when we lack this information, we often fill in the gaps with stereotypes and potentially faulty guesses. Even worse, research has found that only about half of employees open internal communication emails. These studies make it clear that to get a message heard and understood, email is not the right channel.

The ineffectiveness of email results in more meetings. Only 7 percent of information communicated comes from the actual words we are saying, according to Professor Albert Mehrabian at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). The other 93 percent of communicated information comes through how we say the words, non-verbal cues, the tone of voice, context, and feedback. Unfortunately, meetings tend to turn into a bunch of status updates because people aren't getting the information they need from other channels. An hour-long meeting is a very inefficient way to get status updates.

So, it's important to use a communication platform that captures everyone's input and stores it in a central location. Some teams may use tools such as Slack, while others may have collaboration built into their system. The important things are to ensure the tools the teams use to communicate are connected to the tools that planning stakeholders use.

As software releases become more frequent, the way things used to be done is just not keeping up. Productivity is critical, but it is just one component of improving overall enterprise software testing performance. Taking a fresh look at how teams can work better together will ensure that testing isn't a bottleneck, but rather a catalyst for delivering software faster.

Bob Davis is CMO at Plutora

The Latest

May 22, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on the top tools to support DevSecOps. Part 2 covers DevOps and development ...

May 21, 2018

While DevSecOps, much like DevOps itself, is more about changing IT culture than employing certain types of technology, some tools can be an important support. To find out what the right tools are, DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on the top tools to support DevSecOps. Part 1 covers the testing phase ...

May 17, 2018

The top two business priorities for CIOs of midsize enterprises (MSEs) in 2018 are growth and digital transformation. However, 57 per cent of MSEs are not yet delivering digital initiatives, according to findings from Gartner Inc.'s 2018 CIO Agenda Survey ...

May 15, 2018

Almost every company is facing the challenge of digital transformation today. This means rethinking and retooling your company to compete and succeed in an increasingly digital world. While digital transformation is not only about technology, the right tools can help. To find out what these right tools are, APMdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on the essential tools to support digital transformation ...

May 08, 2018

With data breaches consistently being in the news over the last several years, it is no wonder why data privacy has become such a hot topic and why the European Union (EU) has put in place General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which will become enforceable on May 25, 2018, which is less than a month away ...

May 03, 2018

The prospect of increased workloads, combined with shrinking mainframe skillsets, has huge implications for mainframe DevOps. The only way for organizations to solve this skills gap crisis is by optimizing developer productivity. Drilling down a level further, what does this all mean for mainframe DevOps? ...

May 02, 2018

When it comes to operations and development, DevOps has changed the traditional compartmentalized style of development by eliminating silos. But what about the security team? Security is largely still siloed from operations and development. No doubt, many DevOps teams have some security controls baked into their automation processes, but a recent survey shows there are still alarming gaps ...

April 30, 2018

According to the 2018 Global Security Trends in the Cloud report, 93 percent of respondents faced challenges when deploying their current on-premises security tools in the cloud, and 97 percent lacked the tools, cross-functional collaboration and resources to gain proper insight into security across the organization. These numbers indicate a big problem in DevSecOps that needs to be addressed ...

April 26, 2018

Moving more workloads to the cloud is a top IT priority, so eventually it will be time to consider how to make those critical legacy applications cloud ready. In Part 1 of this blog, I outlined the first four of eight steps to chart your cloud journey. In addition, consider the next four steps below ...

April 25, 2018

Clearly, moving applications to the cloud delivers significant advantages. So what's standing in the way of full cloud adoption? For many companies it's those burdensome (but critically important) legacy applications. Moving more workloads to the cloud is a top IT priority. So, eventually it will be time to consider how to make those critical legacy applications cloud ready. Consider the following eight steps to chart your cloud journey ...

Share this